Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk’s recent decision to roll back the FDA’s authorization of mifepristone, the first drug in the standard two-part medication abortion protocol, is an unprecedented judicial act. The ruling directly opposes the scientific judgment of the FDA and demonstrates illogical thinking, ignored context, and unscientific findings. Kacsmaryk uses the language of the anti-abortion movement over scientific terminology, claims that mifepristone’s side effects overwhelm the medical system, and perpetuates the myth that people who have abortions are deeply traumatized. Additionally, Kacsmaryk argues that pregnancy cannot be considered an “illness,” and therefore, mifepristone cannot be therapeutic. However, reputable studies suggest that having an abortion is not linked to mental health problems, and restricting access to safe, legal abortions causes harm. Furthermore, pregnancy can be risky and physically demanding, and its complications can be serious or life-threatening. Ultimately, Kacsmaryk’s opinion demonstrates a warped view of abortion and pregnancy, departing from reality and dangerously perpetuating disinformation.
Check Also
Youth, science, environment triumph in Montana climate case.
Main Takeaways from the Montana Climate Trial Decision A recent decision in a Montana District …